
Originally Posted by
LadyEye Jeremy, the images are all in .jpg format, what format do you think they are in??
While it is nice of you to guess who the professional is, perhaps you as a professional might see with all your technical and schooling knowledge, that all of the images have been optimized and in the case of the images on this site, the jpeg format is more efficient. If the .gif format was used, the images would be of poor quality, regardless of the viewer’s display. The dithering seen in jpeg images does not compromise image quality any more than if you dithered the images to 256-color .gifs yourself. If you standardize on jpeg images, the majority of your viewers will see full-colour photos.
The image compression in the GIF file format is less efficient than JPEG compression
Advantages of JPEG images
- Huge compression ratios mean faster download speeds
- Jpeg produces excellent results for most photographs and complex images
- Jpeg supports full-color (24 bit, true color) image
Advantages of GIF images
- gif is the most widely supported graphics format on the web
- gifs of diagrammatic images look better than jpegs
- gif supports transparency and interlacing
One only needs to look at your site to see you have used these very same methods of adding text on top of banners, headers, etc., that you are displaying on your very own website. I don't understand why you would make such a statement. AND aren't banners, logos, etc. a work of art and a matter of ones taste or perspective??
I don’t see any grey background on the 100% satisfaction sticker? In fact I copied the image (ha ha Vasili) and sent it to myself through my email. White background, and the image is a white background – no grey on my machine.
I wonder Jeremy, since you are using Vista, IE7, or possibly even a wide screen, if that is what is distorting these images and causing ghosting of some?? Do you think?? Something to consider in your line of work, don't you think???