I have updated an existing site - please review

[DCOFFICESERVICES]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

Your index page ,at first glance, looked well laid out with nice colours.
You have left a reasonable amount of white space which helps to break up the page into a reasonable reading experience.

On checking the load time And the metetags, this is what I found:

Meta tags analysis.
Title: Title contains no errors.
This tag contains 73 characters.

Title relevancy to page content is good.
The Title relevancy to page content is 75%.

Description: Description meta tag contains no errors.
This tag contains 153 characters.

Description meta tag relevancy to page content is very good.
The Description meta tag relevancy to page content is 91%.

Keywords: Keywords meta tag relevancy to page content is fair.
The keywords meta tag relevancy to page content is 63%.


Web page analysis.
The size of the web page.
The size of the web page is 31932 bytes.

The web page load time.
The web page load time is 11 seconds.

Need to get that load time down a lot....................will check it again later just in case it was a traffic/server timing error.

Thanks for looking David. This analysis you kindly done for me. Is that good stats or do you think I could do better?

Darren

[narobe]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

Hello,
Loads fast. You have a lot of info on the index page but it’s not overwhelming. Nice layout its neet, it has a professional look.
I like it.

[bysandra]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

Hi Darren,
I like it a lot.........love the green and white.....crisp and clean and green..
I am on fairly slow broadband and loads fine....All links fine....

IMO, I would shorten the pages that can be.....You can keep scrolling down after your footer on many of your pages.......
One other thing that I would alter is the word re-use. It still works with your 3Rs theme with the hyphen.

Congratulations great site

[Marincky]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

Nice, very nice. loads fine, laid out well.

[nzbr]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

Despite the fact you have lots of images and contents it is loading fast.
Site is nice and easy to read. Keep it up!
Cheers,

[jkadin]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

The site is well done. Loads quick. One thing why not add a color background that will bring it out more. Other than that a great job.

[davidundalicia]

Re: I have updated an existing site - please review

Your index page ,at first glance, looked well laid out with nice colours.
You have left a reasonable amount of white space which helps to break up the page into a reasonable reading experience.

On checking the load time And the metetags, this is what I found:

Meta tags analysis.
Title: Title contains no errors.
This tag contains 73 characters.

Title relevancy to page content is good.
The Title relevancy to page content is 75%.

Description: Description meta tag contains no errors.
This tag contains 153 characters.

Description meta tag relevancy to page content is very good.
The Description meta tag relevancy to page content is 91%.

Keywords: Keywords meta tag relevancy to page content is fair.
The keywords meta tag relevancy to page content is 63%.


Web page analysis.
The size of the web page.
The size of the web page is 31932 bytes.

The web page load time.
The web page load time is 11 seconds.

Need to get that load time down a lot....................will check it again later just in case it was a traffic/server timing error.

[DCOFFICESERVICES]

Hello Everyone

I am updating one of my existing sites http://www.kindoffice.co.uk/ (work in progress)

Please have a flick around see what you think.

My main concern is the index page

1. Is it too busy?
2. As there is a lot of images. Is the page loading at an acceptable speed?

Other

3. Any other advice?

Thanks

Darren